clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
clerkFlowBot2025-10-06 11:58 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Judge Nomadity.
adriann used
/add
clerkFlowBot2025-10-07 12:20 a.m.
Case Modified
@adriann has added @walter! to the case channel.
adriann2025-10-07 12:23 a.m.
@Doogy Presiding
walter!2025-10-07 01:03 a.m.
I'd like to provide notice that once the court finds probable cause in this matter we will be proceeding to seek a warrant for the defendant's arrest as permitted pursuant to 5 M.S.C. 1 § 1801.5—as opposed to summons for the defendant. @Doogy
Doogy2025-10-07 06:27 p.m.
I haven't reviewed anything for probable cause yet but could you explain the reasoning behind seeking a warrant under §§ 1801.5? I'm not seeing clearly how this would fall under the criteria to be applicable.
walter!2025-10-07 06:29 p.m.
Yes, I'm happy to make my presentations now
walter!2025-10-07 06:31 p.m.
it is important to note that the mere fact that there is a felony charge, let alone multiple, is sufficient here to permit the issuance of a warrant for the defendant's arrest pursuant to S. 1801.5(a)
walter!2025-10-07 06:32 p.m.
however there is also good cause for a risk to the public safety present, satisfying s. 1801.5(b) as well. The State's case here is formed primarily by the assertion that the defendant has taken it upon himself to dish out consequences for crime in the name of the state—including, in this case, an alleged execution
walter!2025-10-07 06:32 p.m.
that type of vigilanteism is a risk to public safety even when taken in the best possible light for the defendant
walter!2025-10-07 06:33 p.m.
@Doogy
Doogy2025-10-07 06:42 p.m.
Right, but it's to my understanding that the Defendant is currently suspended from law enforcement duties pending the conclusion of this case. My only concern is that it would be quite atypical to issue an arrest warrant over a pending criminal matter solely because the Defendant conducted the alleged actions while on duty as law enforcement. This is certainly not the first criminal case with those same circumstances and looking back on previous cases within Mayflower where that is true, no such measures were taken. To be more concise, it's not evident to me how the circumstances presented in this matter would be reaching a threshold in which concern may be drawn to issue an arrest warrant pre-trial or even pre-summons.
walter!2025-10-07 06:53 p.m.
I appreciate the Court's vigor in assessing the request and while I think that there are interesting issues here that I, truly, would love to brief, I also think that the time for the State to give a large push to exercise this portion of Title 5 is not yet upon us for a variety of tactical reasons.
walter!2025-10-07 06:53 p.m.
@Doogy The State withdraws its request that a warrant be issued. A summons will certainly suffice
Doogy2025-10-07 07:01 p.m.
Very well, I shall review the submitted documents then for PC.
walter!2025-10-08 11:07 a.m.
uhh
walter!2025-10-08 11:07 a.m.
@Doogy pc?
Doogy2025-10-08 03:15 p.m.
probable cause
walter!2025-10-08 05:25 p.m.
yes i understand what pc means
walter!2025-10-08 05:25 p.m.
im asking you to act on it
walter!2025-10-08 05:27 p.m.
we're on day two and we haven't even summoned the defendant yet
walter!2025-10-08 07:55 p.m.
@Doogy
Doogy2025-10-08 10:55 p.m.
Okay, looks like it's good enough to proceed. I'll draft a summons. @walter!
walter!2025-10-08 11:08 p.m.
thank you
walter!2025-10-08 11:08 p.m.
can we have an official finding of probable cause for the record here please @Doogy
walter!2025-10-08 11:08 p.m.
just trying to maintain our side for an appeal
Doogy2025-10-08 11:09 p.m.
Probable cause has been established.
It is here so ordered.
Hon. Nomadity ᴘᴄ ᴏᴍ
walter!2025-10-08 11:11 p.m.
thanks :)
universal2025-10-08 11:16 p.m.
served
universal2025-10-08 11:16 p.m.
CC @Doogy
Doogy2025-10-08 11:17 p.m.
thank you mac user
Doogy2025-10-08 11:17 p.m.
Defendant has until 11:00 p.m. to appear before the court.
Doogy2025-10-08 11:18 p.m.
cc: @walter!
walter!2025-10-08 11:19 p.m.
thank you your honor
walter!2025-10-08 11:19 p.m.
and thank you @universal
walter!2025-10-08 11:19 p.m.
fyi: mac usage is valid, superior OS from a user experience pov
i've tried to pay him three times now & he's still so locked in that it didn't cross his mind
Doogy2025-10-17 05:51 p.m.
Update? @walter!@Toby
Toby2025-10-17 05:53 p.m.
Waiting on Walter
Doogy2025-10-19 06:45 p.m.
@walter!
walter!2025-10-19 06:49 p.m.
we have communicated a proposed deal
walter!2025-10-19 06:49 p.m.
we are still in negotiations
walter!2025-10-24 01:09 p.m.
excellent news @Doogy
walter!2025-10-24 01:09 p.m.
thank you for your patience your honor
judicialFLOWBot2025-10-24 01:09 p.m.
@walter! please upload attachments for State of Mayflower v. EnoughWithTheSarcasm now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished. Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
the state respectfully submits this agreement to the court
Doogy2025-10-24 01:38 p.m.
can you clarify what this is supposed to mean "...the suspended sentence shall continue to be suspended permanently" ? @walter!
Doogy2025-10-24 01:38 p.m.
also unacceptable signature by the defendant @sarcasm
Doogy2025-10-24 01:38 p.m.
denied on those grounds
Doogy
denied on those grounds
walter!2025-10-24 01:40 p.m.
tragic
Doogy
can you clarify what this is supposed to mean "...the suspended sentence shall continue to be suspended permanently" ? @walter!
walter!2025-10-24 01:41 p.m.
the intention is that even when the condition is satisfied, the conviction and associated penalties remain (namely, disqualification to serve as a peace officer)
walter!2025-10-24 01:41 p.m.
but that the incarceration sentence remains suspended and no time is served on that charge
Doogy2025-10-24 01:42 p.m.
so record remains but no physical incarceration
Doogy2025-10-24 01:42 p.m.
Ok!
walter!2025-10-24 01:43 p.m.
yes your honor
Doogy
also unacceptable signature by the defendant @sarcasm
walter!2025-10-24 01:43 p.m.
your honor if i may
walter!2025-10-24 01:44 p.m.
i believe that the style of his signature remains a 1a issue and, as it is a signature, he is not at liberty to change it (if he wants it to hold weight) willy nilly
walter!2025-10-24 01:44 p.m.
no pun intended
walter!2025-10-24 01:45 p.m.
if his signature truly does incorporate a... uhh... phallus
walter!2025-10-24 01:45 p.m.
he ought to be able to have his signature on the record
Doogy2025-10-24 01:59 p.m.
Unfortunately I'm denying it nonetheless, I've also deleted the physical file from the trello card due to concerns regarding the Atlassian Acceptable Use policy for scanning of uploads.
walter!
tragic
Toby2025-10-24 02:04 p.m.
LMAO
Doogy
also unacceptable signature by the defendant @sarcasm
sarcasm2025-10-24 02:38 p.m.
i sincerely apologize your honor. that signature was my way of silent resistance against an enemy greater than myself - greater even than this noble and righteous court. an enemy that is lurking in the shadows, preying on unsuspecting petite wearers of badges who have no means to defend themselves against their cold and heartless claws.
sarcasm2025-10-24 02:40 p.m.
is there any judicial means i could make use of to force an answer from the state in this query
Toby2025-10-25 06:42 p.m.
sarcasm
is there any judicial means i could make use of to force an answer from the state in this query
sarcasm2025-10-31 07:40 p.m.
your god-like eminence i still haven't received an answer from the state in pursuit of this query and im starting to get worried the honorable chief counselor may not be ready to face such a deep-seated inquiry regarding his sexuality and (potential) fondness for femboys
sarcasm2025-10-31 07:46 p.m.
i humbly request that you act as a beacon of light, shining a streak of luminescence and clarity on this gloomy matter - as befits this noble court and the pillars of justice it rests on
Doogy2025-10-31 09:58 p.m.
So what's the holdup? Are you guys coming to a deal or are we continuing? @walter!@Toby
walter!2025-10-31 10:22 p.m.
up to @sarcasm
walter!2025-10-31 10:22 p.m.
if he wants to sign with something that is not a penis
walter!2025-10-31 10:22 p.m.
then that would be great
walter!2025-10-31 10:22 p.m.
otherwise the state is ready to go to trial
walter!2025-10-31 10:22 p.m.
cc @Toby
sarcasm2025-11-01 01:32 a.m.
if he can do it why cant i
sarcasm
if he can do it why cant i
Toby2025-11-01 05:41 a.m.
Sign it
Toby
Sign it
sarcasm2025-11-01 01:24 p.m.
sir yes sir
sarcasm2025-11-01 01:24 p.m.
@walter! slide a copy
walter!2025-11-01 09:38 p.m.
@Doogy will you accept this
Doogy2025-11-01 09:40 p.m.
no bruh
Doogy2025-11-01 09:40 p.m.
it needs to be a signature not against tos not some ms paint pic
Doogy2025-11-01 09:41 p.m.
either he signs it for real or we just proceed with no deal
Doogy2025-11-01 09:41 p.m.
doesnt really seem like he wants the deal anyway
walter!2025-11-01 11:39 p.m.
@sarcasm
sarcasm2025-11-02 12:38 a.m.
your divine eminence, you are busting my balls
sarcasm2025-11-02 12:39 a.m.
i spent 5 minutes on that solely for your pleasure
walter!
@Doogy will you accept this
Toby2025-11-02 04:24 a.m.
LOL
walter!
@Doogy will you accept this
sarcasm2025-11-02 04:27 p.m.
would it help if i told you that the two stickmen on the swings were You and I?
Doogy2025-11-16 09:50 p.m.
This matter will be reassigned to a different judge. @Prothonotary's Office
clerkFlowBot2025-11-17 12:10 a.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Judge bommes.
profile2025-11-17 12:10 a.m.
Presiding Hon. Judge, @bommes
bommes2025-11-17 07:59 a.m.
Okay that’s it. I’m voiding this deal because the defendant clearly is not taking this seriously and the government and this court have made good efforts to allow defendant appropriate time to rectify his… insubordination
bommes2025-11-17 07:59 a.m.
@sarcasm Do you have counsel or shall I assign a public defender
@š✰ appears for Counsel for Defendant (approved by @bommes).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
bommes2025-11-17 01:49 p.m.
@š✰ ah yes it’s the third PD
bommes2025-11-17 01:49 p.m.
haven’t seen you in forever
š✰2025-11-17 01:50 p.m.
yeah it's been a bit
bommes2025-11-17 01:59 p.m.
if you’re ready we will proceed with arraignment now
judicialFLOWBot2025-11-17 02:00 p.m.
@š✰ please upload attachments for State of Mayflower v. EnoughWithTheSarcasm now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished. Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
As to count one of the information, felony misconduct: how do you plead?
As to count two of the information, Second degree murder: how do you plead?
As to count three of the information, Aggravated battery: how do you plead?
@sarcasm
bommes2025-11-17 02:01 p.m.
oh that was fast
š✰2025-11-17 02:01 p.m.
do you need courtesy copies as well?
š✰2025-11-17 02:01 p.m.
can make one rq
bommes2025-11-17 02:08 p.m.
nah that’s alright
bommes2025-11-17 02:09 p.m.
okay onto pre-trial we go
bommes used
/pretrial
clerkFlowBot2025-11-17 02:09 p.m.
Pretrial Schedule
Discovery will be taken care of separately during the pretrial period.
Pre-trial motions will be accepted untilTuesday, November 25, 2025 at 2:09 p.m. or 2 months ago.
The pre-trial period will end on Thursday, November 27, 2025 at 2:09 p.m. or 2 months ago.
bommes2025-11-17 02:09 p.m.
CC: @š✰@walter!
judicialFLOWBot2025-11-17 03:05 p.m.
@š✰ please upload attachments for State of Mayflower v. EnoughWithTheSarcasm now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished. Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
@kaira appears for State of Mayflower (approved by @bommes).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
š✰
@bommes
bommes2025-11-21 01:56 a.m.
This is true
kaira2025-11-21 03:12 a.m.
Hello, I tried to appear before the deadline.
kaira2025-11-21 03:13 a.m.
I will still file a response, your Honor, if that's fine? @bommes(edited)
kaira
I will still file a response, your Honor, if that's fine? @bommes(edited)
bommes2025-11-21 05:11 a.m.
I’d first like to ask what took you so long. Was the deadline not enough? What happened?
bommes
I’d first like to ask what took you so long. Was the deadline not enough? What happened?
kaira2025-11-21 05:26 a.m.
No, I was about to submit but I couldn't appear. And I was just given this just recently.
kaira
No, I was about to submit but I couldn't appear. And I was just given this just recently.
bommes2025-11-21 06:09 a.m.
When did you have the document ready
bommes2025-11-21 06:09 a.m.
And what do you mean you couldn’t appear
BotjudicialFLOW
Click to see attachment.(edited)
kaira2025-11-21 06:49 a.m.
I was about to submit it when I asked to appear here
kaira2025-11-21 06:49 a.m.
And I couldn’t appear so I couldn’t submit(edited)
bommes2025-11-21 09:41 a.m.
The request was made before the deadline. Due to clerical error he was unable to submit his filing until now.
bommes2025-11-21 09:42 a.m.
I deem this not to be tardiness, but rather a mix of unfortunate circumstances
š✰2025-11-21 08:42 p.m.
So a response? @bommes
bommes2025-11-22 03:37 a.m.
@kaira Where’s the response
kaira2025-11-22 03:50 a.m.
Here.
judicialFLOWBot2025-11-22 03:50 a.m.
@kaira please upload attachments for State of Mayflower v. EnoughWithTheSarcasm now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished. Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
@kaira@š✰ are you okay with a paperless ruling (e.g. one that's only published in rulings?)
bommes
@kaira@š✰ are you okay with a paperless ruling (e.g. one that's only published in rulings?)
š✰2025-11-29 10:28 a.m.
Yeah that’s cool
bommes2025-11-29 12:02 p.m.
@š✰@kaira ruling is out
bommes2025-11-29 12:02 p.m.
tl;dr: motion is denied
bommes2025-12-04 09:24 a.m.
erm
bommes2025-12-04 09:24 a.m.
right
bommes used
/add
clerkFlowBot2025-12-04 09:24 a.m.
Case Modified
@bommes has added @meowiitten to the case channel.
bommes2025-12-04 09:25 a.m.
Mister Attorney General, sorry to call upon you like this but it appears the assigned prosecutor abandoned the case and this state in its entirety. I would like to hear from you how this should proceed as the head of the department and its offices
š✰2025-12-05 03:03 p.m.
@bommes dismissal
š✰2025-12-05 03:03 p.m.
past pre-trial and in trial stage
š✰2025-12-05 03:03 p.m.
violation of speedy trial clause
bommes2025-12-05 03:10 p.m.
denied
judicialFLOWBot2025-12-05 06:20 p.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @Mlexus Party: deputy attorney general Channel: state-of-mayflower-v-enoughwiththesarcasm
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
I’ll have to question your ability as state counsel otherwise
bommes
Can you not talk like you’re having a stroke
sarcasm2025-12-07 08:53 a.m.
your honor i believe that the deputy attorney general's daily nutritional supplements (a succulent can of tuna) was produced using the yellowfin (Thunnus albacares), notorious for their rather high dosage of mercury. seeing as the deputy attorney general rarely skips meals in order to bulk up in preparation for his hot summer bod, it would not be far fetched to assume that the mercury has started to wilt away opposing counsel's broca's area (responsible for speech production and articulation in the frontal lobe)
@š✰ please upload attachments for State of Mayflower v. EnoughWithTheSarcasm now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished. Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
@Glass appears for State (@bommes) (approved by @bommes).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
Glass2025-12-18 03:04 a.m.
im gonna be honest with you your honor, im not even sure what the goal was here anymore
Glass2025-12-18 03:05 a.m.
but I was assigned the case
Glass2025-12-18 03:05 a.m.
is there anything I need to be aware of regarding this?
bommes2025-12-18 06:30 a.m.
Well there was a plea agreement signed by your predecessor. I’d like you to analyse the facts and the agreement to see whether the state still supports this
bommes
Well there was a plea agreement signed by your predecessor. I’d like you to analyse the facts and the agreement to see whether the state still supports this
Glass2025-12-18 09:56 a.m.
i assume it's still approved by the attorney general since it was done under the DAG's supervision
Glass2025-12-18 10:10 a.m.
@bommes would it be acceptable to the court if we just substitute section 2 for probation of the same time period
Glass2025-12-18 10:11 a.m.
i dont feel like it would be a prudent use of the state's time to hound the defendant over this when CCSO have perfectly capable probation officers to do the exact same thing
Glass2025-12-18 10:12 a.m.
otherwise I see no reason to believe that the agreement has changed or needs to be changed*(edited)
Glass2025-12-18 01:46 p.m.
@bommes can I request that you check dms (unrelated to the case)